WORKFLOW

From question to inspectable evidence.

A disciplined workflow keeps source material, execution behavior and interpretation separate, so a reviewer can understand what the system did—and what it did not establish.

  1. 01

    Frame the investigation

    Define the research question, intended use, scope and constraints. Avoid collecting more personal or sensitive information than the task requires.

  2. 02

    Retrieve source material

    Use supported search, fetch or browser capabilities. Preserve source URLs and available retrieval metadata, while respecting access controls and safety restrictions.

  3. 03

    Inspect execution

    Review job state, timestamps supplied by the service, errors and available trace details. A timeout or failed run is a meaningful outcome—not a successful result.

  4. 04

    Review evidence

    Inspect passages in context and check that exports match their integrity metadata. Distinguish direct source content from summaries or model-generated interpretation.

  5. 05

    Compare claims carefully

    Assess whether cited passages support the wording of a claim. A matching quotation can still be incomplete, outdated or misleading in context.

  6. 06

    Share with context

    Export only supported artifacts, preserve provenance and communicate uncertainty. Downstream agents must use governed interfaces and respect tenant authorization.

What this workflow does not promise

Tinlyt does not make every source reliable, guarantee completeness, or independently certify truth. Live functionality depends on enabled services and the deployment's security and integration configuration.

Open workspace