Desk research
Collect source material around a focused question, retain references and give reviewers a traceable path back to the original page.
Best for: analysts, researchers and knowledge teams.
USE CASES
Make research reviewable.
Tinlyt's evidence-oriented approach can support different workflows. The value depends on source quality, clear scope and careful human review.
Competitive landscape
Compare public product pages, positioning, feature statements and announcements over time where collection and retention are authorized.
Best for: strategy and product teams.
Source-led review
Organize public information for a review process while keeping provenance, dates and uncertainty visible. Findings require independent validation.
Best for: business and risk analysts.
Claim-to-source review
Check whether a cited passage corresponds to a specific statement and flag missing context, weak sourcing or a mismatch for human assessment.
Best for: trust, compliance and editorial workflows.
Agent research inputs
Supply source-linked material to governed agent workflows through supported interfaces. Execution and access remain subject to Platform policy.
Best for: engineering teams building research agents.
Public-web monitoring
Track selected sources where scheduling, storage and alert delivery are configured and verified. Do not treat a planned monitor as an active alert.
Best for: teams with a defined review cadence.
Start with the question, not the tool
Specify the decision the research should support, which sources are acceptable, how fresh the evidence must be and who reviews the result.
Review the workflow